Lean Quality Thoughts

February 22, 2010

Lean and Six Sigma: Combine the two, for double the improvements

Filed under: Lean Manufacturing, Quality, Service Lean, Six Sigma — galukal @ 9:24 am

COMBINING SIX SIGMA AND LEAN TECHNIQUES FOR DOUBLE THE IMPROVEMENT

Lean is based on the Toyota Production System, which has evolved since Second World War. Many of the Six Sigma concepts originated at Motorola in the nineteen-eighties, and then made popular by its adoption at other major American companies, such as G.E., Allied-Signal (now Honeywell), etc. Currently, many firms use a combination of the two techniques to achieve the greatest improvement with the optimum effort. “Lean Champions” are familiar with the “Master Black Belt” requirements and Body of Knowledge, and vice versa. Thus the “Lean Six Sigma” expert was born. So also the Lean Six Sigma approach for improvements, combining the best of both worlds. Depending upon the need, the best tool in the toolbox is used as appropriate, whether it is a Lean technique, or a statistical or graphical one. Sometimes a basic Quality tool such as the fishbone diagram (or a simple technique as “5 Why”) will be the needed method for improvement or root cause analysis.

A comparison of Lean and Six Sigma follows.

Six Sigma and Lean methodology and focus

Six Sigma

  • Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control methodology
  • Focus on Reducing Variation
  • Use of Statistical Techniques
  • Six Sigma is useful for the Stability in the process
Lean

  • Plan, Do, Check, Act methodology
  • Focus on Time or Speed
  • Reducing or Eliminating Non-value Added Activities
  • Lean is useful for Velocity of the process

Lean and Six Sigma

  • Both use a process model
  • Understand the S-I-P-O-C relationship
  • Variations in the inputs will cause variations in the outputs
  • The goal is standardized, consistent inputs and outputs
  • Control the input variations

–       Manpower

–       Machine

–       Material

–       Methods

–       Measurement

–       Information

–       Environment

  • Reduce the output variation through strictly trained manpower, well-maintained machines, strong supplier management, standardized methods, calibrated measurements, uniform accurate & complete information and controlled environment
  • Improvement Project Selection

–       Lean: use Value Stream Mapping

–       Six Sigma: use “Voice of the Customer”

  • Both Lean and Six Sigma are results oriented

–       Lean: metrics might include inventory turns, through-put, productivity, quality, on-time delivery, etc.

–       Six Sigma: financial benefits (ROI, NPV, Payback, etc.), error rate (PPM) are emphasized

  • Both Lean and Six Sigma improvement projects are Team based
  • Both require good Change Management to capture and sustain improvements for the long-term
  • At the end of each project both emphasize Standardization to prevent Juran’s “Saw tooth” effect
  • Six Sigma emphasizes a “Charter” with objectives, scope, resource requirements, time-line, cost benefit analysis, etc.
  • Lean uses the “Future State” vision for aggressive goal setting and utilizes tools such as benchmarking, team brainstorming, “roll up your sleeves” immediate implementation.

–       Creativity before capital translates into the use of low cost/no cost solutions first.

  • Lean axiom is: an improvement done immediately is better than a perfect solution that is late
  • Six Sigma: uses statistical techniques with emphasis on data analysis, experimentation, etc.

Example of Combining Six Sigma and Lean tools & techniques (Lean tools are italicized and underlined)

Define

  • Strategic link to Business Plan
  • Defined Business Impact
  • Structured Brainstorming
  • Cause and Effect Diagrams to identify critical factors
  • Metrics defined and charted
  • Develop a focused Problem Statement and Objective

Measure

  • Develop a Process Map and/or FMEA
  • Develop a Current State Map
  • Identify the variables and how to measure them
  • Analyze measurement system capability
  • Assess the specification and tolerance (Is one in place? Is it the right one?)

Analyze

  • Look at the raw data and characterize the response
  • Abnormal? Other clues? Mean or Variance problem?
  • Spaghetti Diagram
  • Takt Time
  • Future State Map
  • Standard Work Combination
  • Use Graphical Analysis, ANOVA, DOE, and other statistical tools

Improve

  • 5S & Visual Controls
  • Setup Time Reduction (SMED)
  • Pull System, Kanban
  • Cell Design, Level Loading, Line Balancing
  • Use of Design of Experiments (DOE)
  • Move the distribution, Shrink the spread, Confirm the results

Control

  • Mistake proof the process – Poka-yoke, Autonomation
  • Measure the final capability
  • Deploy the appropriate process controls
  • On the critical characteristics:

–       Document the efforts and results

–       Standard Work

–       TPM

Six Sigma, Lean and TOC

  • Lean, Six Sigma and Theory of Constraints are complimentary, not mutually exclusive
  • Use the right tool, or combination of tools, for the right job

Benefits of Lean and Six Sigma

  • Eliminate waste and variation
  • Improved quality
  • Reduced costs for suppliers ð reduced price for the customer
  • Better delivery and customer satisfaction
  • Smoother, seamless, supply chain and better on-time delivery
  • Less overproduction, inventory costs, obsolescence
  • More predictability and consistence
  • Better use of resources, resulting in cost and cycle time reduction

February 8, 2010

Expansion of Lean into service

Filed under: Uncategorized — galukal @ 3:10 pm

The evolution of current lean applications is interesting. Though first started on the shop floor in manufacturing companies, very rapidly lean migrated to non-manufacturing environments. This obviously is due to the need in service situations for the same objectives as on the shop floor: cost and time reduction, value adding and waste elimination.

In the past few years, lean has been fully embraced by office support functions in manufacturing companies (e.g., design & development, sales, purchasing, human resources, etc.) as well as in pure service organizations such as banks, the military, logistics, government, etc. Lean in healthcare is also very much in demand, and is a very special case. In non-manufacturing environments, we typically process information rather than a tangible product. Accuracy and completeness of inputs is key here.  Wherever there is waste, delay and over-processing (duplicate reviews and approvals, for example), lean finds application.

Lean accounting, lean in I.T., lean in the broader supply chain, and lean in the full transactional order-to-cash cycle are other beneficial lean applications much in vogue today.

Many organizations have now combined their six sigma efforts with their lean transformation. Centers of Excellence at many firms now have lean experts and value stream managers. Master Black Belts are given training and certification in lean techniques, and lead Kaizen events. DMAIC (six sigma) and PDCA (lean) cycles are both used as appropriate. Besides the statistical, quality and graphical tools generally used in six sigma, lean/Kaizen building blocks are also integrated into the process improvement efforts at many organizations.

January 26, 2010

Lean is a Never Ending Journey

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — galukal @ 9:13 am

Many firms have appointed and empowered lean champions for successfully implementing their lean transformation. These champions (similar to Master Black Belts in the Six Sigma environment) help others as mentors, trainers, group facilitators, communicators, planners, evaluators, drivers of continuous improvements and cheerleaders celebrating each success.

Some organizations start their lean journey with their first Value Stream Mapping (VSM) of a target process. In this case, a Value Stream Manager is appointed, who helps to facilitate the VSM, and make sure the implementation plan (again, through a series of Kaizens) is on track. After the first VSM activities are successfully completed, another VSM in the same original target area can be performed to squeeze out even more continuous improvement. Also, VSMs can be initiated in other areas, as well, incorporating the lessons learned from the first VSM.

Lean champions or Value Stream Managers also help in permanently capturing for good the gains by standardizing at the higher levels of performance as lean is implemented (through Kaizens), so as not to slip back. Lean will not work in the long term if it is viewed as merely a project, point solution or vehicle for downsizing.

Because lean is a never ending journey, there is always room for continuous improvement—a necessary component of any effective operational improvement or quality management system,  and the key to success in today’s highly competitive, rapidly changing and customer focused global economy.

January 11, 2010

Starting the Lean journey: one proven method

Filed under: Uncategorized — galukal @ 1:32 pm

In many cases, to transform from “traditional” to a “Lean” environment, implementing a pilot projects first, in a Kaizen mode, gets immediate buy-in from skeptics. The success achieved from these quick hitters can then be migrated to other areas in a planned approach. Ultimately, lean has to become the daily work habit or operating philosophy of the whole firm to be sustainable. To identify which lean project to choose as the pilot Kaizen event, many firms start with a Value Stream Mapping of the relevant product/process family.

Starting the lean process is comparatively easy; but sustaining it over the long haul takes robust planning, discipline, commitment, patience, an environment that tolerates some risk or mistakes, a good reward and recognition program and peoples’ receptivity to change and growth. It can not be emphasized enough that the “human” side of lean needs more attention than any other technical Building Block.

Many managers have found the three of the essential ingredients for successful lean implementation are:

• Sustained, hands-on, long-term commitment from senior management.

• Training for all employees in the lean building blocks. These days, webinars are a great medium to teach employees about lean. Both “live” and archived on-line courses are available- the archived webinars have the advantage of self-paced learning, on-demand. Then, implement lean using the Kaizen Plan-Do-Check-Act methodology in “train-do” cycles.

• Good cultural change management during the transformation from the traditional push to the lean pull mentality.

January 4, 2010

A3 Reports and their use

Filed under: Lean Manufacturing, Quality — galukal @ 7:37 pm

The A3 Report as a Lean and Quality tool

Shewhart introduced the concept of the continuous improvement cycle of Plan-Do-Check-Act or “PDCA” about 80 years ago. Now there is a renewed interest in it due to Ishikawa and Deming, and due to the continued emphasis on quality. Also, the focus on operational improvement and Lean has led the tremendous interest in another technique: the “A3″.  Many people do not fully see the utility of, or all the areas where, the A3 can be applied. It is not just a visual communication tool. In Lean it can be used for Kaizens, problem solving, root cause analysis, incremental and/or breakthrough improvements, value stream mapping (VSM), or any planning & deployment (for strategic, Hoshin or annual plan) project. The standardized single page (11’ x 17” size), concise way of displaying all the information needed is valuable in itself. But equally beneficial is the process of creating, communicating, updating and improving the A3 report for the Lean team members who are involved in the project. The completed A3s are preserved for future use, as well as for learning lessons from, and for knowledge sharing.

Toyota (and many other Japanese as well as non-Japanese companies now) emphasize that A3 creation is about storytelling. This visual story can be written using text, graphics digital photographs and diagrams. The heart of the A3 is the Plan-Do-Check-Act improvement cycle.

The “Plan” section will contain the problem statement or the issue under consideration. The “Do” area will show how to implement the Plan; if appropriate a Gantt chart can be included here. The “Check” section will be the triggers for reviews to make sure that the performance is per the Plan. And the “Act” part will guide us in capturing the gains through metrics (in any improvement project) or facilitate the next steps (in a VSM or a strategic/Hoshin Plan). Basic Lean, quality, statistical and graphic tools are extensively used by the Lean teams during the life of each A3 report.

Let us now look at an example:

  • Problem Statement

The set-up time on a machine is too long and inconsistent. Too much non-productive (and unpredictable) time is spent in changeovers.

  • Current State (or Situation)

At present the changeover time varies between 3 and 4 hours. There are major differences between similar machines and across shifts in their set-ups. There is no standardized way of  changing over.

  • Target State (Improved/Future Situation)
    • Root Cause Analysis, Contingency Plan(s), Goal Setting

After data gathering and analysis, the team decided that each changeover can be accomplished within one hour, by among other improvements, converting internal to external time, eliminating un-necessary or duplicate steps, consolidating other steps, working in parallel, and most importantly standardizing the set-up process across machines, work-teams and shifts. The Lean team in charge of this improvement project used simple tools such as 5 Whys, Fishbone diagrams, Spaghetti charts, Time studies, Process flow diagrams.

  • Implementation

A time-line of one week was set for the changeover improvement on the pilot machine. The plan was to migrate this technique, and the lessons learned, after the success of the pilot project to all other machines within 3 months.

  • Results/Metrics
  1. Internal Time
  2. External Time
  3. Standard Work
  4. Completed checklist from each changeover (day and night shifts)
  5. Monthly audits
  6. Changeover team performance
  7. Increase in productive machine time(s)

September 17, 2009

Core Concepts of Lean:

Filed under: Uncategorized — galukal @ 2:50 pm

Presented below are some important concepts that will be useful to keep in mind while preparing for the Lean transformation.

  • Creativity before capital: In Lean, instead of spending large sums of money on capital expenditures, team brainstorming of ideas and solutions is emphasized. People working

in the process are brought together to tap into their experiences, skills and brainpower to generate the plan for reducing wastes and for process improvements.

  • A solution that is not-so-perfect implemented today, is better than a perfect solution that is late. “Just do it now!”
  • Inventory is not an asset, but a cost/waste.
  • Use the proven Plan-Do-Check-Act methodology for deploying improvements- both incremental and breakthrough.
  • Once started, Lean is a philosophy on a never-ending journey.
  • Typically, 95% of lead-time is not value added. Collapsing the lead time closer to the actual processing time by squeezing out non-value added time and tasks results in both cost and cycle time reductions. Henry Ford knew this in 1926, when he said “One of the most noteworthy accomplishments in keeping the price of Ford products low is the gradual shortening of the production cycle. The longer an article is in the process of manufacture and the more it is moved about, the greater is its ultimate cost”.

September 16, 2009

Barriers to Improvement

Filed under: Uncategorized — galukal @ 2:49 pm

As managers, we know that we can not stand still in the face of global competition because our rivals are not standing pat, but improving their processes and systems to catch up with us. If we  do not improve also, sooner or later they will overtake us. We lose market share, our margins deteriorate, sales revenue and profitability suffer. So if we know that we need to improve, the question then becomes: Why don’t we?

Proper planning and implementation management is the key in obtaining enduring success with Lean deployment. Lean is not a quick fix; we are kidding ourselves if we think that Lean implementation is easy. Success requires not only good change management practices, but also the integration of Lean into the overall business strategy. “Flavor of the week” syndrome should be avoided.

Complete implementation of Lean might not be for everybody; so a well thought out master plan based on cost-benefit analysis is a useful preliminary step. Great benefits from Lean implementation are derived by first focusing on what processes we have, the product families we make, the environment we operate in, and the competitive situation we face and using the right technique at the right time. For example, a firm producing parts to customer orders rather than to stock will face different challenges.

Some of the factors in the success of Lean implementation are due to the senior executives active  role in:

  • A planned approach to Lean implementation, rather than point solutions
  • Providing the needed resources
  • Appointing Lean champions
  • Empowered and involved employees; emphasis on teamwork and co-operation
  • Good communication channels- both top down as well as bottom up
  • Managing expectations: e.g. fear of loss of jobs
  • Everybody understanding the need for change, as well as their new roles as change is implemented
  • Creating an atmosphere of experimentation: risk taking environment, safety net for trial and error
  • Good rewards and recognition programs, suggestion systems, gain sharing
  • Making everybody understand the competitive reasons why, and benefits of, Lean for the Company as well as for themselves personally
  • Creating a “vision” of the Future State after the change
  • Introducing a performance measurement system based on meeting company goals
  • Analysis and sharing of costs vs. benefits
  • Emphasizing accountability of everyone

In many cases, implementing pilot projects first, perhaps in a Kaizen Blitz mode, gets immediate buy-in from skeptics. The success achieved from these quick hitters can then be migrated to other areas in a planned approach.  Ultimately, Lean has to become the daily work habit or operating philosophy of the whole firm to be sustainable.

Starting the Lean process is comparatively easy; but sustaining it over the long haul takes robust planning, discipline, commitment, patience, an environment of tolerating some risk/mistakes, good reward and recognition program and peoples’ receptivity to change and grow. Many managers have found that the three essential ingredients for successful Lean implementation are:  (1) sustained, hands-on, long term commitment from Senior management, (2) training in the Lean building blocks for all employees, and (3) good “cultural” change management in the transformation from the traditional “push” to the Lean “pull” mentality.

How to Sustain Lean?

•Internalize into daily work

•It is a never-ending process or philosophy

•Discipline/motivation/incentives

•Continued, visible Management commitment

•Communication channels

•Standardize so as not to slip back

•Role of Lean Champions

•Job Rotation

September 14, 2009

Lean Enterprise

Filed under: Lean Manufacturing — galukal @ 2:48 pm

Enterprise-wide Lean implementation has slightly different challenges compared to deploying  Lean in manufacturing. On the shop floor, there is a tangible product that is being transformed; so the utility of the tools and techniques described in this chapter for cost and cycle time

reduction in the processing of raw materials into usable finished goods are fairly evident. In the office functions in a manufacturing firm or in a strictly service firm many of the same tools and techniques are applicable, be it in a slightly modified form- instead of hardware one looks at value-adding processing and/or use of information (or software). For example, one can visualize the usefulness of Lean in a hospital setting where many processes could be improved from the point of view of cycle time reduction strategies, through proceduralization, team training, standardized work, point of use storage, visual systems, quality at the source, etc. The concept of streamlining and purging of non value-added steps in the “Order to cash” cycle (or RFQ-to-cash cycle) is currently in vogue. Bottlenecks are attacked using the P-D-C-A model and the appropriate Lean building blocks.

September 13, 2009

How to Start the Lean Journey:

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 2:48 pm

The starting point of Lean initiatives could be any one of the following:

(1)    Value Stream Mapping (VSM):  VSM studies the set of specific actions required to bring a product family from raw material to finished goods per customer demand concentrating on information management and physical transformation tasks.  The outputs of a VSM are (1) Current State Map, (2) Future State Map and (3) an Implementation Plan to get from the Current to the Future State. Using VSM, we can drastically reduce the lead time closer and closer to the actual value-added processing time, by attacking the identified bottlenecks and constraints. The Implementation Plan (typically in a short duration such as 12 months) acts as the guide for doing so. Bottlenecks addressed could be long set-up times, unreliable equipment, unacceptable first-pass-yield, high work in process inventories, etc.

(2)    Lean base-line assessment:  using interviews, informal flow-charting, process observations and analysis of reliable data an “as-is” situational report can be generated from which would flow the Lean improvement plan based on the identified “gaps”.

(3)    Start by providing “massive” training in Lean to a critical mass of employees in “teach-do” cycles. Lean implementation should continue immediately after the training.

(4)    Begin by implementing the “basic” building blocks first:  5S, Visual Controls, Streamlined Layout, Point of Use Storage, Standardized Work, etc. Then build on with the higher level tools and techniques, finally achieving flow production based on customer “pull”.

(5)    Pilot Project:  Choose a bottleneck or constraint area to do breakthrough Lean improvement (use the Kaizen Blitz approach); then with the lessons learned migrate Lean implementation to other areas.

(6)    Change Management:  align the company’s strategies and employee’s goals, then change the culture from the traditional “push” production to Lean “pull”.  This should result eventually in a philosophical change in peoples’ daily work life.

(7)    Start by analyzing the internal Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and the OEE losses; a Pareto of these losses will identify the “biggest bang for the buck” to indicate where to start the Lean journey.

September 12, 2009

The “Building Blocks” of Lean:

Filed under: Lean Manufacturing — galukal @ 2:45 pm

The tools and techniques used in the introduction, sustaining and improvement of the Lean system are sometimes referred to as the Lean building blocks. Many of these building blocks are inter-connected, and can be implemented in tandem: for example, 5S (workplace organization and standardization), visual controls, point-of-use-storage, standardized work, streamlined layout, working in teams and autonomous maintenance (part of Total Productive Maintenance) can all be constituents of introducing a planned implementation effort.

The building blocks include:

(a)    5S: a system for workplace organization and standardization. The five steps that go into this technique all start with the letter S in Japanese (seiri, seiton, seison, seiketsu and shitsuke). These five terms are loosely translated as Sort, Set in order, Shine, Standardize and Sustain in English.

(b)    Visual controls: the placement in plain view of all tooling, parts, production activities and indicators so everyone involved can understand the status of the system at a glance.

(c)    Streamlined layout:  plant layout designed according to optimum operational sequence.

(d)    Standardized work: consistent performance of a task, according to prescribed methods, without waste, and focused on human movement (ergonomics).

(e)    Batch size reduction:  the best batch size is one-piece flow, or make one and move one!  If one-piece flow is not appropriate, reduce the batch to the smallest size possible.

(f)       Teams:  in the Lean environment, the emphasis is on working in teams, whether it be improvement teams or daily work teams.

(g)    Quality at the Source: inspection and process control by the operators so that they are certain that the product that is passed on to the next process is of acceptable quality.

(h)    Point of Use Storage:  raw material, parts, information, tooling, work standards, procedures, etc. are stored where needed.

(i)      Quick Changeover:  the ability to change tooling and fixtures rapidly (usually in minutes) so multiple products in smaller batches can be run on the same equipment.

(j)      Pull/Kanban:  a system of cascading production and delivery instructions from downstream to upstream activities in which the upstream supplier does not produce until the downstream customer signals a need (using a “Kanban” system).

(k)    Cellular/Flow:  physically linking and arranging manual and machine process steps into the most efficient combination to maximize value-added content while minimizing waste; the aim is single-piece flow.

(l)      Total Productive Maintenance:  a Lean equipment maintenance strategy for maximizing overall equipment effectiveness.

Besides the building blocks mentioned above, there are other concepts or techniques that are equally important in Lean:  Value Stream Mapping (VSM), Just-In-Time (JIT) methods, Error Proofing (“poka-yoke”), Autonomation (“jidoka”), Continuous Improvement (“Kaizen”), Kaizen Blitz* for breakthrough improvements, Change Management, etc.

*term service-marked by the Association for Manufacturing Excellence.

Since Lean is a never ending journey, there is always room for continuously improving.

Lean will not work if it is viewed as merely a project, or as point solutions, or as a vehicle for downsizing.  It works best if deployed as a never-ending philosophy of improvement. Many firms have appointed and empowered Lean “Champions” for successfully implementing their Lean transformations; these Champions help others as mentors, trainers, group facilitators and communicators and act as the drivers of continuous improvements, planners, evaluators and cheerleaders celebrating each success. They also help in permanently “capturing the gains” by standardizing at the higher levels of performance as Lean is implemented, so as not to slip back.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress